Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Didions on Morality Essay Example for Free
Didions on Morality actWhat is it that forms and drives our incorrupt behaviors? Are we born with a basic sense of pietism or do we acquire a set of moral social codes to keep society from falling into chaos and anarchy? In her essay On Morality, Joan Didion dissects what lies beneath the surface of hu partitys morality. By recounting several stories and historic sluicets, she shows that morality at its basic most primitive take is nothing more than our loyalties to the ones we love, everything else is subjective. Didions startle story points out our loyalty to family.She is in Death Valley writing an article about morality, a word she distrust more every day. She relates a story about a young man who was drunk, had a car accident, and died while driving to Death Valley. His girl was found alive but eject internally, deep in shock, Didion states. She talked to the nurse who had driven his girl 185 miles to the nearest doctor. The nurses husband had stayed with the body until the coroner could get there. The nurse said, You just cant leave a body on the highway, its immoral. According to Didion this was one instance in which she did not distrust the word, because the nurse meant something quite specific. She argues we adoptt desert a body for even a few minutes lest it be desecrated. Didion claims this is more than except a sentimental consideration. She claims that we promise each other to try and retrieve our casualties and not abandon our asleep(predicate) it is more than a sentimental consideration. She stresses this point by give tongue to that if, in the simplest terms, our upbringing is grave bountiful we stay with the body, or have bad dreams. Her point is that morality at its most primary level is a sense of loyalty to one another that we learned from our love ones. She is saying that we stick with our loved ones no matter what, in sickness, in health, in bad times and good times we dont abandon our dead because we dont essentia l someone to abandon us. She is professing that morality is to do what we think is right whatever is necessary to meet our primary loyalties to care for our loved ones, even if it means sacrificing ourselves.Didion emphatically states she is talking about a wagon-train morality, and For better or for worse, we are what we learned as children. She talks about her childhood and hearing graphic litanies about the Donner-Reed party and the Jayhawkers. She maintains they failed in their loyalties to each other, and creaky one another. She says they breached their primary loyalties, or they would not have been in those situations. If we go against our primary loyalties we have failed, we grief it, and thus have bad dreams. Didion insist that we have no way of knowingwhat is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil. She sees politics, and public policy falsely assigned aspects of morality. She warns us not to delude ourselves into thinking that because we want or need s omething that it is a moral imperative that we have it, then is when we join the fashionable madmen. She is saying this will be our demise, and she may well be correct. Hitlers idea that he had a moral imperative to purify the Aryan race serves as a poignant reminder of such a delusion.In 1939 Hitlers Nazi army invaded Poland and started World War II. World War II came to an bar in large part due to the United States dropping two atomic bombs. If the war had act and escalated to the point of Hitlers Nazis and the United States dropping more atomic bombs we could have destroyed most, if not all, of humanity, the final act of fashionable madmen. We may believe our behaviors are just and righteous, but Didions essay makes us closely examine our motives and morals. She contends that madmen, murders, war criminals and religious icons throughout history have said I followed my feature conscience. I did what I thought was right. Maybe we have all said it and maybe we have been wrong . She shows us that our moral codes are often subjective and fallacious, that we rationalize and justify our actions to suit our ulterior motives, and our only trustworthy morality is our loyalty to those we love. It is this loyalty to those we love that forms our families, then our cities, our states, our countries and ultimately our global community. Without these moral codes, social fiat would break down into chaos and anarchy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.