Comparing and Contrast the Chemical Disasters at Bhopal

In todays modern society, as many an(prenominal) countries have been developing very fast, the technologies argon reaching towering standards of level, for example, the laid-back qualities weed killers and the liquid cleaner. However, as the big invention occurring, the more than(prenominal) and more mis micturates will be going on, because round technologies, such as weed killer and liquid cleaners argon chemical substances. With no doubt, chemicals are re tot exclusivelyyy harmful for human beings. As people all agnise that, toxic chemicals are used in the industries, which have to be safely covered and provide very serious use instruction, such as wearing long gloves, safety shoes or masks.However, even the chemicals are under several instruction manual, but people may have make almost serious mistakes which caused a huge damage and large centre of death to people. In this essay, I am going to write active the two disasters that caused a lot of injures by the explosio n of poisonous chemicals, which set(p) in India and Italy. According to Shrivastava (1996), on the night of 2/3 declination 1984, an enormous accident happened in Bhopal, India, the highly poisonous and unbalanced chemical gas was escaped from the factory and continue to spread over the urban center which caused by the lack of the attention and care ness.Apart from that, Marchi and Funtowicz and Ravetz (1996) states that in the 10 July 1976, a powerful weed killer which named 245T was exploded in a smaller town which located near Milan, the 245T contained the most powerful and toxic chemicals, it stub kill any live stocks and human very easily, the accident was caused by man made unmanaged instructions and the toxic dioxin was spilled to the atmosphere. Between these two accidents, they were all caused by people non nature. Unlikely, these two took places in variant occlusive and locations. Luke (1984) believed that the Bhopal accident was caused by the ignorance of experts.T his factory was built in a herd population environment, and because they against the rule of US safety standard, too much substance of MIC was contained in the store and due to the huge quantity of it, the tank was not strong enough to hold the chemical, as the safety manual essential at o degree, the safety system was broken down and urine leaking in to it and set off the reaction. The chemicals were released into the air. Bhopal and Seveso were similar in that, according to Marchi & Funtowicz & Ravetz (1996) because of the unmanaged instructions and the ignorance, the disasters had a substantial damage and effect.According to Gail (2003), the Indian governing made a great effort in trying to manipulate the situation, yet all their attempts failed to provide the sufficient supply of medical services and food supply. there was not enough place for all the hurt people to proceed medical treatment. That is because of the large number of injuries and the lack of doctors and medi cine. Added to this, doctors at Bhopal had no nous of what kind of affection they were dealing with. Unfortunately, most people arrived at the infirmary when it was too late, differents died while waiting for their tern to master a doctor.Similar to Bhopal, Seveso suffered from lack of present(prenominal) responses and from ignorance of what exactly happened and what gases were released. Late decisions of evacuation and other responses were made, after the regime head start move of realizing and defining the accident and its possible consequences. B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, and J. Ravetz (1996), believe that Seveso had a burst response than Bhopal, when a comparison betwixt the two disasters were made. The Italian Government had more ability to absorb the affects in a shorter period of time.Unlike Bhopal, the extremity of recovery was reasonably good, due to the smaller affects, less damage and the high financial capability. There were compensations to victims, redeploymen t to people lost their jobs and there was most control on health long-term do by monitor them through a practical planned program. The main difference between the effects of the accidents at Bhopal and Seveso is that many people died at Bhopal, whereas there was no any death cases reported in any article at Seveso. Death is considered a short-term effect. David (2002) believes they were roughly 7000 death cases at Bhopal.Baines (1993) mentioned other short-term effects at Bhopal such as difficulty and snapper irritation. Similar symptoms appeared on Seveso survivors. Added to this, Shrivastava (1996) points out that people exposed to the released gas had some other short-effects such as cough, vomiting and chest pains. Long-term effects at Bhopal mainly were eye-sight weakness and high possibility of get different kinds of Cancer. No long-term effects are in detail in The long road to recovery, (B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, and J. Ravetz 1996), neither in Environmental Disasters, (Baines 1993).These disasters had baffling so many people, some were dead, and some were seriously injured . Also, some people may have a great risk of getting the negative effect in their rest of lives. Due to these happened , there mustiness be someone stand up and taking the responsibility for the huge damages and waste . In the disaster of Bhopal , the keep company which involved in was union Carbide , this company in USA was decreased their value of stocks by this failure. Furthermore, the Union Carbide in India has to accept to pay the funding for the patients and for the damages.Even though, the American company against to accept the legal responsibility which done by themselves. But, the local government and a lot of lawyers have sued the company, and they won the beat, so they got the funding for the injured families and hospitals. (Bhopal India DIS Covering Science). In contrast, according to The long road to recovery, by B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, and J. Ravetz (199 6), the company of the Seveso had paid for the hospitals and government and any hurt, and they will be more concern closely how to do the securities very carefully and reasonable.To avoiding these things happen again, all(prenominal) people and individuals have done something to hold open these kinds of disasters. First of all, according to the articles, local government had legislate some issues for caring the chemicals and warning people who were functional with the chemicals must pay a lot of attentions on it. Also, the companies which producing the chemicals have to be located far from the high proportions of people in the neighborhoods and providing the knowledge for hospitals about how to cure the chemical disease.In conclusion, every one and society have to do something to avoid the disaster happen, because no one wants to die or wants to see other people dead. So, from these two disasters, People have studied how to prevent the disaster happen, and not just blame some on e to take responsibility after the disasters. Even though these two serious events had happened days ago, it still named the one of the worst industrial disaster in the world, because many innocent people were died for it, and too many people had to injure the plaguy during their rest of lives. Essay Foundation 001Academic writing Comparing and contrast the chemical disasters at Bhopal in India and Seveso in Italy Student full name Li Fei Lu (Lulu) Teacher Chris Beard Essay length 1190 words credit rating A chronology of events at Seveso and Seveso adapted from B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, and J. Ravertz (1996) Seveso A paradoxical classic in The long road discovery Community responses to industrial disaster redact by James K. Mitchell United nations University Press. Bhopal, India. DISCovering Science. Online Edition. Gale, 2003. Reproduced in student Resource Center.Detroit Gale, 2004. http//galenet. galegroup. com/servlet/SRC downloaded 26 November 2004 Cancer fears haunt sur vivors of Italian chemical disaster (1997) Cancer weekly Plus Retrieved January 23, 2005, from the Expanded Academic Database David, L (2002) Night of the Gas smart Internationalist p34 (2) p9 Retrieved January 23, 2005, from the Expanded Academic Database Shrivastava, P (1996) Long-term recovery from the Bhopal crisis in The long road to recovery Community responses to industrial disaster edited by James K. Mitchell United Nations University Press (adapted)